Acrodus sp, tooth, 7/UMK

Acrodus sp.

Middle Triassic, Upper Muschelkalk (Ladinian), Upper Silesia, Poland

Description

A beautifully preserved tooth crown from Acrodus sp.. The root is missing, suggesting it was much less durable than the crown itself. In fact, these occasionally broken (though still recognizable) crowns are often the only identifiable elements in the “fishy mess” of vertebrate remains I encounter.

The specimen did not require preparation. I removed some of the surrounding matrix to enhance the contrast.

For a long time, distinguishing the ornamentation of Acrodus lateralis from Acrodus gaillardoti has been a challenge for me, and I’m sure I still make occasional mistakes. However, the general diagnostic features are as follows:

Acrodus gaillardoti: The teeth are usually larger (over 15 mm long). A prominent longitudinal ridge is visible at the top, from which radiating striae radiate, forming a ladder-like pattern.

Acrodus lateralis: The teeth are usually smaller. The striae run from the base and converge towards the apex, forming a more radiating pattern.

In this case I’m not sure – ornamentation looks a bit like A. lateralis, size and shape more like A. gaillardoti.

In addition to these characteristics, morphological variation in the teeth must be considered. Acrodus was heterodont, meaning that the shape and size of its teeth varied significantly depending on their position in the jaw. This, of course, makes identification even more challenging.

Missing tooth root

Böttcher suggests in Böttcher (2024) that missing tooth roots in hybodonts are the result of root resorption during tooth replacement. This theory is supported by his research, which shows that over 90% of specimens are rootless. This is also consistent with my observations—the vast majority of specimens are crown-only.

References

  • Böttcher, Ronald. (2024). Root resorption during tooth replacement in sharks – a unique character of the Hybodontiformes (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii). Palaeodiversity. 17. https://doi.org/10.18476/pale.v17.a6

Changes

  • 2026-08-24 – added “Missing toot root” section and reference to Böttcher (2024)

SilesianTriassic is a private hobby project about fossils from the Triassic of Silesia. I try to document and interpret specimens as best as possible, but identifications are tentative and may be incorrect.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.